Encountered by netizens on the issue of how to rationalize fees and charges became a focus of concern. Experts said that the increase in oil quality or more effective "vehicle sewage charges" - this item has not yet been explicitly charged, has not yet introduced a program of new charges, recently because of an expert And was hotly discussed. However, it is undeniable that the "automobile sewage charges" can not cover the fact that: Vehicle emissions have become the main source of air pollution in large and medium-sized cities.
The rebound of public opinion mainly stems from speculation about the intention of collecting "sinking money" for sewage charges and doubts about its "pollution-controlling" effect. Experts analyzed that tail gas pollution is not only due to the increase in the number of cars, but also closely related to urban planning, public transport, fuel quality, and even public driving habits. This further explores which one of the greatest impacts and which one is not done well. The key to solving the problem.
Recently, Li Zuojun, deputy director of the Research Institute of Resources and Environment of the Development Research Center of the State Council, revealed that the government is levying sewage charges on cars. It is currently in the stage of demonstration and is expected to be implemented after the 18th National Congress. The policy of levying automobile sewage charges is likely to be piloted first-line cities such as “Beichuan Guangshen†and gradually promoted to the whole country. The rumors reopened the news that the non-intention was actually. This is not the first time that a "car sewage charge" has been proposed. It coincides with the "Proposal on Further Improving the Air Quality in the Capital" proposed by the Beijing Municipal CPPCC three months ago. The motion proposes to continue to adopt economic incentives, including the collection of motor vehicle sewage charges to control the use of vehicles.
Similar to the "sewage charges", there are "environmental taxes." As early as 2010, the relevant person in charge of the Beijing Municipal Development and Reform Commission had publicly stated that the state has started to study the issue of environmental taxes and fees for motor vehicles, and the pollution emissions from motor vehicles will It is included in the scope of environmental tax collection. However, after some local governments clearly stated their intentions, the policy has stalled. Fang Li, deputy director of the Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau, told the media that whether it is feasible to collect sewage charges still needs to go through all aspects of the argument, take corresponding procedures, and far from implementation.
Even Li Zongjun, deputy director of the recent disclosure of information, when the reporter called for his confirmation, he also changed his mind: "Online is not my intention." So what is the intention, Li Zuojun do not want to say more. The public feedback on the limited impact on heavily polluted vehicles and the levy policy, “windy and not raining,†correspond to the fact that Internet public opinion has “one-sided†opposition. Most car owners report that adding car sewage charges directly increases the burden of car ownership, and that it is becoming more and more common to be able to afford it.
According to Mr. Li, the owner of the private car, after buying a car, the bulk of the car is fuel and parking fees, both of which have kept the trend of rising only. The tax on vehicles and boats and insurance add up to around 1,500 yuan, as well as the cost of routine maintenance, not to mention accidental expenses. The salaried car owners believe that the increase in vehicle charges for the sewage charges is mainly due to the owners of vehicles with a price of less than 200,000 yuan.
"If you increase the vehicle sewage charges, even if the cost is low, it may be the last straw to suffocate the owner." Mr. Li said that he is spending at least 2,000 yuan on car-raising a month, and his attitude can only be saved. The province. He also pointed out that the impact of levying sewage charges on "civil vehicles," "rich vehicles," and "heavy-polluted vehicles" is limited, and therefore the effect of controlling the number of vehicles is also difficult to guarantee.
From the main reasons opposed by netizens, it focuses on two aspects: whether the policy is fair and whether the policy can effectively curb pollution. In the survey of netizens named "How do you see this year's or per-emission vehicle sewerage fees?" initiated by Foshan TV's Xiaoqiang Hotline, 76.7% of respondents believe that "there are irrational heavy charges," and 10% of the respondents It is believed that 8.3% of netizens have reservations about “developing fair charging standardsâ€, and the last 5% of netizens agreed to “effectively reduce tail gas pollutionâ€.
The level of non-displacement in the level of pollution competition determines if the implementation of the fees, the most basic requirements of the public is fair and effective, however, as of now, there is no specific charging standards and programs come out. Prior to this, industry sources disclosed that the establishment of a vehicle sewerage fee collection rule is likely to be the same as the vehicle and vessel tax, which is levied on the basis of displacement: that is, the exhaust volume is 1.0 or less, 1.1 to 2.0, etc., and taxes are charged according to different amounts. However, the argument of “discharging according to emission†was questioned by “fairness.†Most people think that this kind of fee standard is fair and unreasonable. The degree of vehicle emissions is not completely determined by the size of the displacement. In response, Luo Lei, deputy secretary-general of the China Automobile Dealers Association, has repeatedly stressed: “The vehicle emission fees are levied on a displacement basis and there is considerable controversy. Vehicle use time and distance are different, so the impact on urban congestion and air pollution is also different. Emissions are levied on a per-distribution basis, and owners of the same displacement have to pay the same fees, which is unfair.†Ma Jun, research director of China's public environmental center, believes that to make the vehicle's sewage charges reach its original goal of “pollution controlâ€, attention should be paid to three. The work of the party can make the people pay "conscientiously".
First, there must be a fair fee standard. Second, to determine the amount of charge, Ma Jun said: “If you collect more, you really have some restraint for large-displacement motor vehicles, but if it is less, I’m afraid it will be hard to work. Instead, it increases the burden.†Third, the fee collection should include details of receipts and expenditures. Unclear achievements Improve oil quality and benefit air quality. What kind of charging standard is more reasonable? The director of the Laboratory of Vehicle Fuel and Emissions of the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Yue Xin, told reporters that in terms of fees, it is more reasonable to charge “by area†rather than “by areaâ€, that is, for the center of the city. Sewage charges will be collected in specific areas such as the zone, and there will be less or no charges for more open areas such as suburbs.
There are also "charges for fuel consumption." Yue Xin thinks that the introduction of sewage charges into fuel taxes or fuel costs is also a relatively fair approach. According to the principle of multi-payment, the more vehicles they drive, the more fuel they consume, and they should be charged accordingly. More expenses. Yue Xin believes that the quality of gasoline and diesel should be improved. He pointed out that once the quality of the fuel used by the car is increased, the sulfur content will be reduced, which will achieve immediate results for both new and used cars. It is also the fastest way to improve urban air quality. Whether a car can “drink†a healthier oil is considered to be the key to solving the problem of tail gas pollution, but it is also precisely the part that progresses slowly.
The premise that the issue is to make private cars become a choice rather than a necessity. Ma Jun said that in terms of collecting parking fees, congestion fees and other economic measures to control exhaust pollution and even urban congestion, there are internationally successful precedents, including New York, London and Hong Kong. In his opinion, the degree of tail gas pollution is determined by many aspects. “Congestion on roads and tail gas pollution are also related. The stagnation of vehicle exhaust emissions is ten times higher than normal driving. There is also public driving habits. Air conditioning, long traffic interruptions, and improvements in these areas are all conducive to governance.†But Ma Jun believes that the fundamental premise for solving the problem lies in the establishment of a well-developed public transportation system, so that private cars should become “an optionâ€. Rather than "a necessity."
This also depends on good urban planning, and functional areas should be properly divided. As for new energy vehicles that actively encourage development, will this solve the problem of tail gas pollution to some extent? In July this year, the State Council issued a new plan that said that the development of the automotive industry will use pure electric power as the main strategic orientation for the development of new energy vehicles and the transformation of the automobile industry. In this regard, Wei Anli, deputy secretary-general of the China Internal Combustion Engine Industry Association, said that before the problem of battery materials was solved, the electric car was too far away from us. The recycling of used batteries is also a huge challenge for the development of electric vehicles. Ma Jun pointed out that if the problem of the battery is not solved, the electric car will still repeat the mistakes of the electric bicycle, and the battery will cause lead pollution. This is a new technology that causes new pollution. Therefore, from the current point of view, this is not yet the "centering pill."
The rebound of public opinion mainly stems from speculation about the intention of collecting "sinking money" for sewage charges and doubts about its "pollution-controlling" effect. Experts analyzed that tail gas pollution is not only due to the increase in the number of cars, but also closely related to urban planning, public transport, fuel quality, and even public driving habits. This further explores which one of the greatest impacts and which one is not done well. The key to solving the problem.
Recently, Li Zuojun, deputy director of the Research Institute of Resources and Environment of the Development Research Center of the State Council, revealed that the government is levying sewage charges on cars. It is currently in the stage of demonstration and is expected to be implemented after the 18th National Congress. The policy of levying automobile sewage charges is likely to be piloted first-line cities such as “Beichuan Guangshen†and gradually promoted to the whole country. The rumors reopened the news that the non-intention was actually. This is not the first time that a "car sewage charge" has been proposed. It coincides with the "Proposal on Further Improving the Air Quality in the Capital" proposed by the Beijing Municipal CPPCC three months ago. The motion proposes to continue to adopt economic incentives, including the collection of motor vehicle sewage charges to control the use of vehicles.
Similar to the "sewage charges", there are "environmental taxes." As early as 2010, the relevant person in charge of the Beijing Municipal Development and Reform Commission had publicly stated that the state has started to study the issue of environmental taxes and fees for motor vehicles, and the pollution emissions from motor vehicles will It is included in the scope of environmental tax collection. However, after some local governments clearly stated their intentions, the policy has stalled. Fang Li, deputy director of the Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau, told the media that whether it is feasible to collect sewage charges still needs to go through all aspects of the argument, take corresponding procedures, and far from implementation.
Even Li Zongjun, deputy director of the recent disclosure of information, when the reporter called for his confirmation, he also changed his mind: "Online is not my intention." So what is the intention, Li Zuojun do not want to say more. The public feedback on the limited impact on heavily polluted vehicles and the levy policy, “windy and not raining,†correspond to the fact that Internet public opinion has “one-sided†opposition. Most car owners report that adding car sewage charges directly increases the burden of car ownership, and that it is becoming more and more common to be able to afford it.
According to Mr. Li, the owner of the private car, after buying a car, the bulk of the car is fuel and parking fees, both of which have kept the trend of rising only. The tax on vehicles and boats and insurance add up to around 1,500 yuan, as well as the cost of routine maintenance, not to mention accidental expenses. The salaried car owners believe that the increase in vehicle charges for the sewage charges is mainly due to the owners of vehicles with a price of less than 200,000 yuan.
"If you increase the vehicle sewage charges, even if the cost is low, it may be the last straw to suffocate the owner." Mr. Li said that he is spending at least 2,000 yuan on car-raising a month, and his attitude can only be saved. The province. He also pointed out that the impact of levying sewage charges on "civil vehicles," "rich vehicles," and "heavy-polluted vehicles" is limited, and therefore the effect of controlling the number of vehicles is also difficult to guarantee.
From the main reasons opposed by netizens, it focuses on two aspects: whether the policy is fair and whether the policy can effectively curb pollution. In the survey of netizens named "How do you see this year's or per-emission vehicle sewerage fees?" initiated by Foshan TV's Xiaoqiang Hotline, 76.7% of respondents believe that "there are irrational heavy charges," and 10% of the respondents It is believed that 8.3% of netizens have reservations about “developing fair charging standardsâ€, and the last 5% of netizens agreed to “effectively reduce tail gas pollutionâ€.
The level of non-displacement in the level of pollution competition determines if the implementation of the fees, the most basic requirements of the public is fair and effective, however, as of now, there is no specific charging standards and programs come out. Prior to this, industry sources disclosed that the establishment of a vehicle sewerage fee collection rule is likely to be the same as the vehicle and vessel tax, which is levied on the basis of displacement: that is, the exhaust volume is 1.0 or less, 1.1 to 2.0, etc., and taxes are charged according to different amounts. However, the argument of “discharging according to emission†was questioned by “fairness.†Most people think that this kind of fee standard is fair and unreasonable. The degree of vehicle emissions is not completely determined by the size of the displacement. In response, Luo Lei, deputy secretary-general of the China Automobile Dealers Association, has repeatedly stressed: “The vehicle emission fees are levied on a displacement basis and there is considerable controversy. Vehicle use time and distance are different, so the impact on urban congestion and air pollution is also different. Emissions are levied on a per-distribution basis, and owners of the same displacement have to pay the same fees, which is unfair.†Ma Jun, research director of China's public environmental center, believes that to make the vehicle's sewage charges reach its original goal of “pollution controlâ€, attention should be paid to three. The work of the party can make the people pay "conscientiously".
First, there must be a fair fee standard. Second, to determine the amount of charge, Ma Jun said: “If you collect more, you really have some restraint for large-displacement motor vehicles, but if it is less, I’m afraid it will be hard to work. Instead, it increases the burden.†Third, the fee collection should include details of receipts and expenditures. Unclear achievements Improve oil quality and benefit air quality. What kind of charging standard is more reasonable? The director of the Laboratory of Vehicle Fuel and Emissions of the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Yue Xin, told reporters that in terms of fees, it is more reasonable to charge “by area†rather than “by areaâ€, that is, for the center of the city. Sewage charges will be collected in specific areas such as the zone, and there will be less or no charges for more open areas such as suburbs.
There are also "charges for fuel consumption." Yue Xin thinks that the introduction of sewage charges into fuel taxes or fuel costs is also a relatively fair approach. According to the principle of multi-payment, the more vehicles they drive, the more fuel they consume, and they should be charged accordingly. More expenses. Yue Xin believes that the quality of gasoline and diesel should be improved. He pointed out that once the quality of the fuel used by the car is increased, the sulfur content will be reduced, which will achieve immediate results for both new and used cars. It is also the fastest way to improve urban air quality. Whether a car can “drink†a healthier oil is considered to be the key to solving the problem of tail gas pollution, but it is also precisely the part that progresses slowly.
The premise that the issue is to make private cars become a choice rather than a necessity. Ma Jun said that in terms of collecting parking fees, congestion fees and other economic measures to control exhaust pollution and even urban congestion, there are internationally successful precedents, including New York, London and Hong Kong. In his opinion, the degree of tail gas pollution is determined by many aspects. “Congestion on roads and tail gas pollution are also related. The stagnation of vehicle exhaust emissions is ten times higher than normal driving. There is also public driving habits. Air conditioning, long traffic interruptions, and improvements in these areas are all conducive to governance.†But Ma Jun believes that the fundamental premise for solving the problem lies in the establishment of a well-developed public transportation system, so that private cars should become “an optionâ€. Rather than "a necessity."
This also depends on good urban planning, and functional areas should be properly divided. As for new energy vehicles that actively encourage development, will this solve the problem of tail gas pollution to some extent? In July this year, the State Council issued a new plan that said that the development of the automotive industry will use pure electric power as the main strategic orientation for the development of new energy vehicles and the transformation of the automobile industry. In this regard, Wei Anli, deputy secretary-general of the China Internal Combustion Engine Industry Association, said that before the problem of battery materials was solved, the electric car was too far away from us. The recycling of used batteries is also a huge challenge for the development of electric vehicles. Ma Jun pointed out that if the problem of the battery is not solved, the electric car will still repeat the mistakes of the electric bicycle, and the battery will cause lead pollution. This is a new technology that causes new pollution. Therefore, from the current point of view, this is not yet the "centering pill."
Carbon Steel Products,Carbon Steel Pipe,Carbon Steel Plate,Carbon Steel Tube
Shandong Panhua Metal Material Co. LTD , https://www.panhuametal.com